One Strike and You’re Out
Friday, May 29th, 2009Most of us are familiar with the baseball rule, “three strikes and you’re out.” This principle is also applied in other life situations, such as in the workplace. For instance, an employer might allow a worker to be late a few times before firing that person. Or, we might allow a person to make a few mistakes before we decide to fire that person.
Parents may use a similar approach with their children. The first time the child misbehaves there is a warning. A more strict warning is issued the second time. On the third incident, the parent might impose a harsh punishment.
In recent years, I’ve noticed a variation on this principle – and it is being applied not only to behavior that we find intolerable, but also to beliefs we find offensive. The rule I’m referring to is:
One strike and you’re out.
Here’s how it works. If John has one belief that Mary doesn’t like or finds offensive, then Mary wants nothing to do with John. Mary will not listen to John. She will not respect John. John becomes an outcast in her eyes and NOTHING he can say or do has any worth or value to her. Mary’s aim is to “banish” John from “her” world.
A good example of this is the invitation that the University of Notre Dame extended to President Barack Obama to be the graduation speaker at its May 17 graduation ceremony. Because President Obama has supported the rights of women to have abortions in certain instances, many people associated with Notre Dame (clergy and alumni) said the President should not have been invited to speak to the graduates.
One strike and he was out – that was their view. Because he did not condemn abortion, he should not have the right to address the graduates. In the end, President Obama did speak at Notre Dame and was well received. The vast majority of the students and alumni welcomed him.
It’s important to stress that President Obama did not go to Notre Dame to talk about abortion rights. He was there to give the graduates inspiration and helpful advice on how to live their lives after graduating.
Can we say that President Obama has nothing of value to say to the graduates because he is not against all abortions?
You’re free to take that position and I’m not here to argue for or against abortion. Believe as you wish.
However, those who want to banish people or “muzzle” them because of their stance on ONE issue are, in my view, perpetuating an intolerance that is not consistent with any definition of spiritual growth. (unless you define spiritual growth as only accepting people who agree with your core beliefs).
It is my feeling that even those who advocate this “one strike and you’re out” philosophy don’t even believe it themselves. We can find situations where they will quickly abandon this philosophy.
For example, let’s say Jim is against abortion and feels it is murder. He doesn’t want any proponent of abortion to speak at his daughter’s graduation. He doesn’t want anyone who supports abortion to be on his local school board. Pro-abortion people, in Jim’s world, are murderers to be denounced.
Jim’s daughter has a serious illness. She is dying. There is only one doctor in the world who can perform a revolutionary new operation that could save his daughter. You guessed it – the doctor supports abortion rights. Would Jim allow this pro-abortion doctor to save his daughter’s life…or would he whisper to his daughter, “I’m sorry, honey. I’d love to help you but this man is a murderer and we can’t allow him to operate on you. We must remain true to our principles.”
You know – and I know – that in 99% of the cases, Jim would allow the pro-abortion doctor to operate on his daughter. And he’d be expressing his love for the doctor before and after the procedure. So, in this instance, Jim is willing to “suspend” the “one strike and you’re out” approach.
On all other issues, however, when his self-interest and that of his family is not at stake, he vehemently clings to the one strike philosophy.
This “one strike” philosophy is at odds with almost all religions. How can we denounce someone for his or her belief on an issue and yet remain consistent with “loving your neighbor as yourself,” “loving your enemies” and not judging others?
How could those who denounced President Obama – and who said he shouldn’t even have the right to speak – say that they were treating him with love?
I fully support the rights of everyone to peacefully and vigorously advance whatever position they want. If you feel a passion to speak out against abortion, by all means do so. But that can be done without judgment and hatred. How can judgment and hatred lead to spiritual growth and a closer connection with God?
I’m not a Bible scholar, but if I recall correctly, Jesus did not join in when the townspeople denounced the prostitute and wanted to stone her. Instead Jesus said, “let He who is without sin cast the first stone.”
This one strike and you’re out theory isn’t limited to highly emotional religious issues like abortion. We see it in many situations, especially politics.
If Jane calls herself liberal then she may close her mind and heart to those who refer to themselves as conservatives. The moment you say you’re conservative, Jane doesn’t need to listen to anything you say about anything. You may think I’m exaggerating here, and I am, but let’s not kid ourselves as to how our labels often lead us to the one strike and you’re out approach.
In the course of my writing over the last 20 years, I’ve had numerous experiences where someone will send me a letter or email along these lines:
“I’ve been reading your articles for many years and have agreed with the views you have expressed. However, when I read your article published yesterday in which you said ________, I completely disagree with you and have lost respect for you. You’ve lost all credibility with me.”
One strike and I was out.
Even if I said 2,000 wonderful things (in this person’s view) over a period of 10 years, once I touched a core belief of theirs, I had to be dismissed. I had nothing more of value to say on any subject.
We simply can’t grow spiritually when we close our minds and hearts based on a belief that others hold. We can’t grow spiritually when we won’t see another person, in all their humanity, in THAT moment, without applying labels like liberal or conservative — or even criminal vs. law-abiding citizen.
This doesn’t mean we choose mass murderers to be graduation speakers or invite child molesters to babysit our children. We are not closing our eyes to the conduct of others. Yet we don’t need to reject these people or refuse to listen to them on any issue. That is not love. Love will take “protective” action when needed. But it will not protect more than is needed. It does not cast a wide net unnecessarily. Spirit does not support the one strike and you’re out approach.
I’ve practiced the one strike and you’re out strategy many times. Yet my spirit has shown me that it’s not the way to go. Keep doing it if you wish, but know that you are moving farther and farther away from your spirit – and farther away from the peace and love you want to experience.
– Jeff Keller
© 2009